<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-11-15T17:42:00Z</responseDate>
  <request verb="ListRecords" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://andygrove.systems/oai</request>
  <ListRecords>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:monograph-2026</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>High Output Operations for Human + Agent Teams: Limiting Steps, Queueing &amp; L0–L3 Task-Relevant Maturity (2026 Monograph &amp; 42-Hour CPD Syllabus)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Andygrove.systems Industrial Engineering &amp; Operations Research Collective</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Continuing Professional Development; Fresh AI Agent Preprints; Little's Law; Kingman Queueing; Task-Relevant Maturity</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Open-access Continuing Professional Development (42 PDH / CPE / CEU / CPD hours) and Executive Upskilling Hub built directly on 16 fresh 2023–2026 arXiv, NBER &amp; HBS preprints (https://andygrove.systems/preprints) and 6 quantitative self-study modules (https://andygrove.systems/education) for Chief Operating Officers (COOs), Industrial Engineers, Operations Researchers, BizOps &amp; Program Managers, and Process &amp; Quality Engineers.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/andygrove-hybrid-operations-monograph-2026.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprints</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/education</dc:identifier>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-01</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>Queue &amp; AI: When Faster Tasks Slow Down the Workflow — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2605.27202)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Silvia Bartolucci, Pierpaolo Vivo (UCL &amp; King&apos;s College London)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; QUEUEING &amp; VARIANCE WEDGE; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Proves how fast AI draft generation creates a &apos;spike-and-tail&apos; service distribution (&apos;variance wedge&apos;): escaped errors return as heavy rework while congested human reviewers rationally lower scrutiny precisely when risk peaks. COO Production Rule: Never scale agent draft volume without verifying t_rev + p_err·t_fix &lt; t_manual, α_AI &gt; α_crit, and filtering defects before human reviewers.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-01</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-01.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27202</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-02</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>AgentRouter: Heterogeneous Model Routing for Cost-Optimal Multi-Step Agentic Workflows — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2609.22951)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Rudrendu Kumar Paul, Sourav Nandy</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; STEP-LEVEL COST ROUTING; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Trains a &lt;5ms 12M-parameter trajectory router across 50,000 steps (GAIA, SWE-bench, WebArena, ToolBench) and 4 model tiers, cutting inference cost by ~72% while retaining 97.3% of frontier-only performance (vs. 31% for single-turn RouteLLM). COO Production Rule: Route per trajectory step (parsing/tool-formatting → small tier; ambiguous synthesis → frontier tier), never one frontier model per whole workflow.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-02</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-02.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22951</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-03</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>Single-Agent LLMs Outperform Multi-Agent Systems on Multi-Hop Reasoning Under Equal Thinking Token Budgets — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2604.02460)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Dat Tran, Douwe Kiela (Stanford University)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; TOKEN BUDGET &amp; TOPOLOGY; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Uses the Data Processing Inequality (DPI) to prove that under equal thinking-token budgets, multi-agent message passing loses mutual information and trails single-agent reasoning unless context rot on noisy long inputs degrades single-agent focus. COO Production Rule: Audit every multi-agent architecture at equal token budget; eliminate decorative inter-agent chatter unless noisy-context compression or privilege isolation requires it.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-03</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-03.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.02460</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-04</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>When Should AI Agents Ask? Clarification Requests Under Limited Human Attention — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2610.41129)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Hanzhao Wang, Shengjie Liu, Zhengchao Wang</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; HUMAN ATTENTION QUEUES; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Models parallel AI agents sharing one human supervisor with finite attention as a queueing dynamic program; introduces Pairwise Coordination Policy (PCP) so agents condition escalation on real-time human queue congestion. COO Production Rule: Make agent escalation thresholds queue-aware: when senior human WIP rises, throttle low-value clarifications and defer non-urgent subtasks.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-04</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-04.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41129</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-05</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>CascadeDebate: Multi-Agent Deliberation for Cost-Aware LLM Cascades — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2604.12262)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Raeyoung Chang, Dongwook Kwon, Jisoo Lee, Nikhil Verma</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; ESCALATION CASCADES; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Injects lightweight multi-agent deliberation strictly at uncertain escalation boundaries of a cost-aware LLM cascade, resolving borderline ambiguity on small models before paying frontier-tier or human escalation costs. COO Production Rule: Trigger consensus/verification ensembles only on borderline-confidence items, keeping clear routine traffic single-pass.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-05</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-05.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.12262</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-06</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>AI Agents for Inventory Control: Human-LLM-OR Complementarity — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2602.12631)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Jackie Baek, Yaopeng Fu, Will Ma, Tianyi Peng</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; HUMAN + LLM + OR TRIAD; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Evaluates multi-period operational control on InventoryBench, proving that pairing LLMs (unstructured context translation) + exact Operations Research solvers (constrained stochastic math) + human oversight beats standalone LLMs or pure OR. COO Production Rule: Never pay reasoning tokens to approximate linear/stochastic optimization; let LLMs parameterize exact OR solvers under human governance.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-06</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-06.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.12631</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-07</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>Intelligent AI Delegation — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2602.11865)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Nenad Tomašev, Matija Franklin, Simon Osindero (Google DeepMind)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; DELEGATION GOVERNANCE; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Establishes a formal operational framework for multi-hop human-to-agent and agent-to-agent delegation covering dynamic authority bounds, contract specification, verification checkpoints, and accountability chains. COO Production Rule: Assign one named human owner and pair every delegated agent permission with a machine-verifiable acceptance test and rollback switch.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-07</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-07.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.11865</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-08</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>DelegationBench: Measuring When AI Agents Should Ask Before Acting — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2610.05532)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Shiva Pochampally</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; ABSTENTION &amp; ESCALATION EVALS; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Tests 10 models across 156 matched-pair irreversible vs. reversible scenarios: surface prompt rephrasing swings act-now rates by up to 52.5 percentage points, and live tool-executing agents check in far less than static evaluators. COO Production Rule: Enforce hard programmatic L1 gates (not prompt politeness) before high-blast-radius actions (external emails, refunds, production DB writes).</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-08</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-08.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05532</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-09</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail? (MAST Taxonomy) — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2503.13657)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Mert Cemri, Melissa Z. Pan, Shuyi Yang, Lakshya A. Agrawal, Matei Zaharia, Ion Stoica et al.</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; MULTI-AGENT FAILURE TAXONOMY; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Analyzes 1,600+ execution traces across 7 multi-agent frameworks, classifying 14 failure modes across specification flaws, inter-agent misalignment, and absent task verification. COO Production Rule: Institutionalize weekly trace 1-on-1s: most multi-agent failures are handoff contract and inspection-gate defects, not base-model IQ limits.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-09</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-09.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13657</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-10</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>The Cybernetic Teammate: A Field Experiment on Generative AI Reshaping Teamwork and Expertise — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (NBER w33641)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Fabrizio Dell’Acqua, Charles Ayoubi, Raffaella Sadun, Ethan Mollick, Karim R. Lakhani et al.</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; HYBRID TEAM ORG DESIGN; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Pre-registered field experiment with 776 P&amp;G professionals: 1 human + AI matched the performance of 2-person cross-functional human teams while erasing R&amp;D vs. commercial functional silos. COO Production Rule: Redesign bloated cross-functional handoff chains into compact &apos;1 generalist-specialist + AI&apos; pods, reserving multi-human review for final sign-off.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-10</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-10.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://www.nber.org/papers/w33641</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-11</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2408.03314)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Charlie Snell, Jaehoon Lee, Kelvin Xu, Aviral Kumar</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; TEST-TIME COMPUTE ALLOCATION; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Shows that allocating inference compute adaptively by prompt difficulty via process verifiers lets smaller models beat 14× larger models at substantially lower total FLOPs. COO Production Rule: Allocate extra verification tokens strictly to hard tail tasks rather than paying frontier parameter prices on 80% routine volume.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-11</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-11.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03314</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-12</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>AI Agents That Matter — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2407.01502)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Sayash Kapoor, Benedikt Stroebl, Zachary S. Siegel, Nitya Nadgir, Arvind Narayanan</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; PARETO COST-ACCURACY EVALS; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Demonstrates that SOTA agent scaffolds often burn 10×–50× higher API cost for negligible accuracy gains and fail on holdout robustness when evaluated without joint cost-accuracy Pareto curves. COO Production Rule: Mandate 2D Pareto evals (Verified Accuracy vs. USD/Task) before promoting any agent scaffold from R&amp;D into production.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-12</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-12.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01502</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-13</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Data — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2406.18665)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Isaac Ong, Amjad Almahairi, Wei-Lin Chiang, Joseph E. Gonzalez, Ion Stoica et al.</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; PREFERENCE-TRAINED ROUTERS; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Trains lightweight query routers on human preference data to dynamically select between strong and weak LLMs, cutting single-turn frontier call costs by 50–85% without degrading response quality. COO Production Rule: Deploy calibrated preference routers in front of single-turn LLM gateways and step-aware routers (PP-02) for multi-step agent loops.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-13</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-13.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.18665</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-14</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>When Combinations of Humans and AI Are Useful: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2405.06087)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Michelle Vaccaro, Abdullah Almaatouq, Thomas W. Malone (MIT)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; HUMAN-AI COMPLEMENTARITY META-LAW; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Meta-analysis of 106 experimental studies (370 effect sizes): naive human+AI pairing underperforms the best solo actor on pure prediction/decision tasks, but achieves true synergy in modular creation + structured verification workflows. COO Production Rule: Do not ask humans to &apos;eyeball&apos; calibrated probability outputs; partition creative synthesis, exact solver checks, and exception judgment cleanly.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-14</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-14.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.06087</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-15</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>FrugalGPT: How to Use Large Language Models While Reducing Cost and Improving Performance — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (arXiv:2305.05176)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Lingjiao Chen, Matei Zaharia, James Zou (Stanford University)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; LLM CASCADES &amp; CACHING; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Introduces the foundational three-lever inference cost stack — prompt compaction, semantic/prefix approximation caching, and learned LLM cascades — matching GPT-4 accuracy with up to 98% cost reduction. COO Production Rule: Stack immutable prefix caching (EQ-10) ahead of learned confidence cascades so routine volume never hits frontier billing.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-15</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-15.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05176</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
    <record>
      <header><identifier>oai:andygrove.systems:pp-16</identifier><datestamp>2026-11-15</datestamp></header>
      <metadata>
        <oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
          <dc:title>Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of AI on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality — Continuing Professional Upskilling Study Brief (SSRN 4573321)</dc:title>
          <dc:creator>Fabrizio Dell’Acqua, Edward McFowland III, Ethan R. Mollick, Karim R. Lakhani et al. (758 BCG Consultants)</dc:creator>
          <dc:subject>Professional Upskilling; JAGGED FRONTIER &amp; CENTAUR SPLIT; COO Operations</dc:subject>
          <dc:description>Inside the capability frontier, AI lifted output +12.2%, speed +25.1%, and quality +40%; on deceptive tasks just outside the frontier, AI users dropped −19 percentage points below unassisted humans due to unverified reliance. COO Production Rule: Re-map your workflow&apos;s Jagged Frontier at every model-release inflection point and enforce &apos;Centaur&apos; hard task boundaries.</dc:description>
          <dc:date>2026-11-15</dc:date>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/preprint/pp-16</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://andygrove.systems/papers/pp-16.pdf</dc:identifier>
          <dc:relation>https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4573321</dc:relation>
          <dc:language>en</dc:language>
          <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
        </oai_dc:dc>
      </metadata>
    </record>
  </ListRecords>
</OAI-PMH>